APA
Schulz-Wendtland R., Dilbat G., Bani M., Fasching P. A., Lux M. P., Wenkel E., Schwab S., Loehberg C. R., Jud S. M., Rauh C., Bayer C. M., Beckmann M. W., Uder M. & Meier-Meitinger M. (2012). Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?. : Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.
Chicago
Schulz-Wendtland R, Dilbat G, Bani M, Fasching P A, Lux M P, Wenkel E, Schwab S, Loehberg C R, Jud S M, Rauh C, Bayer C M, Beckmann M W, Uder M and Meier-Meitinger M. 2012. Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?. : Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.
Harvard
Schulz-Wendtland R., Dilbat G., Bani M., Fasching P. A., Lux M. P., Wenkel E., Schwab S., Loehberg C. R., Jud S. M., Rauh C., Bayer C. M., Beckmann M. W., Uder M. and Meier-Meitinger M. (2012). Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?. : Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.
MLA
Schulz-Wendtland R, Dilbat G, Bani M, Fasching P A, Lux M P, Wenkel E, Schwab S, Loehberg C R, Jud S M, Rauh C, Bayer C M, Beckmann M W, Uder M and Meier-Meitinger M. Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?. : Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 2012.