APA

Schulz-Wendtland R., Dilbat G., Bani M., Fasching P. A., Lux M. P., Wenkel E., Schwab S., Loehberg C. R., Jud S. M., Rauh C., Bayer C. M., Beckmann M. W., Uder M. & Meier-Meitinger M. (2012). Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?. : Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

Chicago

Schulz-Wendtland R, Dilbat G, Bani M, Fasching P A, Lux M P, Wenkel E, Schwab S, Loehberg C R, Jud S M, Rauh C, Bayer C M, Beckmann M W, Uder M and Meier-Meitinger M. 2012. Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?. : Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

Harvard

Schulz-Wendtland R., Dilbat G., Bani M., Fasching P. A., Lux M. P., Wenkel E., Schwab S., Loehberg C. R., Jud S. M., Rauh C., Bayer C. M., Beckmann M. W., Uder M. and Meier-Meitinger M. (2012). Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?. : Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

MLA

Schulz-Wendtland R, Dilbat G, Bani M, Fasching P A, Lux M P, Wenkel E, Schwab S, Loehberg C R, Jud S M, Rauh C, Bayer C M, Beckmann M W, Uder M and Meier-Meitinger M. Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?. : Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. 2012.