The deception and fallacies of sponsored randomized prospective double-blinded clinical trials: the bisphosphonate research example. [electronic resource]
Producer: 20140513Description: e37-44 p. digitalISSN:- 1942-4434
- Alendronate -- adverse effects
- Appetite Depressants -- adverse effects
- Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw -- etiology
- Bone Density Conservation Agents -- adverse effects
- Deception
- Diphosphonates -- adverse effects
- Double-Blind Method
- Drug Combinations
- Female
- Femoral Fractures -- chemically induced
- History, 20th Century
- Humans
- Lactones -- adverse effects
- Male
- Pharmacovigilance
- Prospective Studies
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic -- ethics
- Reference Standards
- Reproducibility of Results
- Research Design
- Research Report -- standards
- Research Support as Topic -- standards
- Retrospective Studies
- Sulfones -- adverse effects
- Tuberculosis, Pulmonary -- drug therapy
- United States
- United States Food and Drug Administration
No physical items for this record
Publication Type: Historical Article; Journal Article
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.