The deception and fallacies of sponsored randomized prospective double-blinded clinical trials: the bisphosphonate research example.

Marx, Robert E

The deception and fallacies of sponsored randomized prospective double-blinded clinical trials: the bisphosphonate research example. [electronic resource] - The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants - e37-44 p. digital

Publication Type: Historical Article; Journal Article

1942-4434

10.11607/jomi.te40 doi


Alendronate--adverse effects
Appetite Depressants--adverse effects
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw--etiology
Bone Density Conservation Agents--adverse effects
Deception
Diphosphonates--adverse effects
Double-Blind Method
Drug Combinations
Female
Femoral Fractures--chemically induced
History, 20th Century
Humans
Lactones--adverse effects
Male
Pharmacovigilance
Prospective Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic--ethics
Reference Standards
Reproducibility of Results
Research Design
Research Report--standards
Research Support as Topic--standards
Retrospective Studies
Sulfones--adverse effects
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary--drug therapy
United States
United States Food and Drug Administration