| 000 | 00920 a2200229 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250513153743.0 | ||
| 264 | 0 | _c19981029 | |
| 008 | 199810s 0 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a0360-3016 | ||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00220-x _2doi |
|
| 040 |
_aNLM _beng _cNLM |
||
| 100 | 1 | _aSuwinski, R | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aWhy the utility of a normalized dose-response gradient (gamma-factor) should be redefined. _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 |
_bInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics _cSep 1998 |
||
| 300 |
_a463 p. _bdigital |
||
| 500 | _aPublication Type: Comment; Letter | ||
| 650 | 0 | 4 | _aDose-Response Relationship, Radiation |
| 650 | 0 | 4 | _aModels, Theoretical |
| 700 | 1 | _aWithers, H R | |
| 773 | 0 |
_tInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics _gvol. 42 _gno. 2 _gp. 463 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-3016(98)00220-x _zAvailable from publisher's website |
| 999 |
_c9752949 _d9752949 |
||