000 01491 a2200409 4500
005 20250513141755.0
264 0 _c19980615
008 199806s 0 0 eng d
022 _a0268-1161
024 7 _a10.1093/humrep/13.2.387
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aDonovan, J F
245 0 0 _aComparison of microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection/in-vitro fertilization with repeat microscopic reconstruction following vasectomy: is second attempt vas reversal worth the effort?
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)
_cFeb 1998
300 _a387-93 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
650 0 4 _aCost-Benefit Analysis
650 0 4 _aCytoplasm
650 0 4 _aEpididymis
_xpathology
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aFertilization in Vitro
_xeconomics
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aInfertility, Male
_xsurgery
650 0 4 _aMale
650 0 4 _aMicroinjections
650 0 4 _aPregnancy
650 0 4 _aReoperation
650 0 4 _aSpermatozoa
650 0 4 _aSuction
650 0 4 _aVasovasostomy
_xeconomics
700 1 _aDiBaise, M
700 1 _aSparks, A E
700 1 _aKessler, J
700 1 _aSandlow, J I
773 0 _tHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)
_gvol. 13
_gno. 2
_gp. 387-93
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.2.387
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c9525022
_d9525022