000 01430 a2200397 4500
005 20250513073434.0
264 0 _c19930915
008 199309s 0 0 eng d
022 _a0960-1643
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aBuntinx, F
245 0 0 _aDoes feedback improve the quality of cervical smears? A randomized controlled trial.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
_cMay 1993
300 _a194-8 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Clinical Trial; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
650 0 4 _aAdult
650 0 4 _aBelgium
650 0 4 _aClinical Competence
650 0 4 _aDouble-Blind Method
650 0 4 _aFamily Practice
_xstandards
650 0 4 _aFeedback
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aGynecology
_xstandards
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aMale
650 0 4 _aMass Screening
_xstandards
650 0 4 _aQuality of Health Care
650 0 4 _aUterine Cervical Neoplasms
_xprevention & control
650 0 4 _aVaginal Smears
_xstandards
700 1 _aKnottnerus, J A
700 1 _aCrebolder, H F
700 1 _aSeegers, T
700 1 _aEssed, G G
700 1 _aSchouten, H
773 0 _tThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
_gvol. 43
_gno. 370
_gp. 194-8
999 _c8346662
_d8346662