| 000 | 00895 a2200241 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250513010416.0 | ||
| 264 | 0 | _c19821021 | |
| 008 | 198210s 0 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a0007-4861 | ||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1007/BF01605647 _2doi |
|
| 040 |
_aNLM _beng _cNLM |
||
| 100 | 1 | _aWare, G W | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aComparison of two dislodgable residue extraction methods. _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 |
_bBulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology _cJun 1982 |
||
| 300 |
_a748-51 p. _bdigital |
||
| 500 | _aPublication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article | ||
| 650 | 0 | 4 | _aMethods |
| 650 | 0 | 4 |
_aPesticide Residues _xisolation & purification |
| 700 | 1 | _aEstesen, B J | |
| 700 | 1 | _aBuck, N A | |
| 773 | 0 |
_tBulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology _gvol. 28 _gno. 6 _gp. 748-51 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF01605647 _zAvailable from publisher's website |
| 999 |
_c7104130 _d7104130 |
||