000 01376 a2200409 4500
005 20250517141325.0
264 0 _c20171207
008 201712s 0 0 eng d
022 _a1943-393X
024 7 _a10.3758/s13414-017-1295-8
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aEng, Vivian
245 0 0 _aStimulus-response incompatibility eliminates inhibitory cueing effects with saccadic but not manual responses.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bAttention, perception & psychophysics
_cMay 2017
300 _a1097-1106 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Journal Article
650 0 4 _aAttention
_xphysiology
650 0 4 _aCues
650 0 4 _aEye Movements
_xphysiology
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aInhibition, Psychological
650 0 4 _aMale
650 0 4 _aPhotic Stimulation
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aPsychomotor Performance
_xphysiology
650 0 4 _aReaction Time
_xphysiology
650 0 4 _aSaccades
_xphysiology
650 0 4 _aYoung Adult
700 1 _aLim, Alfred
700 1 _aKwon, Simon
700 1 _aGan, Su Ren
700 1 _aJamaluddin, S Azrin
700 1 _aJanssen, Steve M J
700 1 _aSatel, Jason
773 0 _tAttention, perception & psychophysics
_gvol. 79
_gno. 4
_gp. 1097-1106
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1295-8
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c26906347
_d26906347