000 01730 a2200505 4500
005 20250517103740.0
264 0 _c20170905
008 201709s 0 0 eng d
022 _a1433-3023
024 7 _a10.1007/s00192-016-3072-y
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aMadsen, Lene Duch
245 0 0 _aNative-tissue repair of isolated primary rectocele compared with nonabsorbable mesh: patient-reported outcomes.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bInternational urogynecology journal
_cJan 2017
300 _a49-57 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
650 0 4 _aAged
650 0 4 _aChi-Square Distribution
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aFollow-Up Studies
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aLogistic Models
650 0 4 _aMiddle Aged
650 0 4 _aPatient Reported Outcome Measures
650 0 4 _aPatient Satisfaction
650 0 4 _aPostoperative Complications
_xetiology
650 0 4 _aProspective Studies
650 0 4 _aPlastic Surgery Procedures
_xadverse effects
650 0 4 _aRectocele
_xpsychology
650 0 4 _aRegistries
650 0 4 _aStatistics, Nonparametric
650 0 4 _aSurgical Mesh
650 0 4 _aSurveys and Questionnaires
650 0 4 _aSweden
650 0 4 _aTreatment Outcome
650 0 4 _aUterine Prolapse
_xpsychology
650 0 4 _aVagina
_xsurgery
700 1 _aNüssler, Emil
700 1 _aKesmodel, Ulrik Schiøler
700 1 _aGreisen, Susanne
700 1 _aBek, Karl Møller
700 1 _aGlavind-Kristensen, Marianne
773 0 _tInternational urogynecology journal
_gvol. 28
_gno. 1
_gp. 49-57
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3072-y
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c26192669
_d26192669