000 01280 a2200373 4500
005 20250512010211.0
264 0 _c19900111
008 199001s 0 0 eng d
022 _a0010-7824
024 7 _a10.1016/0010-7824(89)90055-3
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aDicker, D
245 0 0 _aThe vaginal contraceptive diaphragm and the condom--a reevaluation and comparison of two barrier methods with the rhythm method.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bContraception
_cOct 1989
300 _a497-504 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
650 0 4 _aAdolescent
650 0 4 _aAdult
650 0 4 _aContraceptive Devices, Female
_xadverse effects
650 0 4 _aContraceptive Devices, Male
_xadverse effects
650 0 4 _aEvaluation Studies as Topic
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aFollow-Up Studies
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aMiddle Aged
650 0 4 _aNatural Family Planning Methods
700 1 _aWachsman, Y
700 1 _aFeldberg, D
700 1 _aAshkenazi, J
700 1 _aYeshaya, A
700 1 _aGoldman, J A
773 0 _tContraception
_gvol. 40
_gno. 4
_gp. 497-504
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0010-7824(89)90055-3
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c2588671
_d2588671