000 01447 a2200373 4500
005 20250517021517.0
264 0 _c20150513
008 201505s 0 0 eng d
022 _a1551-7489
024 7 _a10.5055/jom.2015.0257
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aBarnes, Michael C
245 0 0 _aEvaluating motives: Two simple tests to identify and avoid entanglement in legally dubious urine drug testing schemes.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bJournal of opioid management
_c
300 _a89-100 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Retracted Publication; Review
650 0 4 _aAttitude of Health Personnel
650 0 4 _aBiomarkers
_xurine
650 0 4 _aCommerce
_xlegislation & jurisprudence
650 0 4 _aConflict of Interest
650 0 4 _aFraud
_xlegislation & jurisprudence
650 0 4 _aHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aMotivation
650 0 4 _aPhysician's Role
650 0 4 _aPredictive Value of Tests
650 0 4 _aReproducibility of Results
650 0 4 _aSubstance Abuse Detection
_xlegislation & jurisprudence
650 0 4 _aSubstance-Related Disorders
_xdiagnosis
650 0 4 _aUrinalysis
700 1 _aWorthy, Stacey L
773 0 _tJournal of opioid management
_gvol. 11
_gno. 1
_gp. 89-100
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.5055/jom.2015.0257
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c24687769
_d24687769