000 01362 a2200409 4500
005 20250516233818.0
264 0 _c20141113
008 201411s 0 0 eng d
022 _a1532-7361
024 7 _a10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.047
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aWright, G Paul
245 0 0 _aCost-efficiency and outcomes in the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer disease: laparoscopic versus open approach.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bSurgery
_cOct 2014
300 _a1003-7 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Comparative Study; Evaluation Study; Journal Article
650 0 4 _aAdult
650 0 4 _aAged
650 0 4 _aCost-Benefit Analysis
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aHospital Charges
_xstatistics & numerical data
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aLaparoscopy
_xeconomics
650 0 4 _aLength of Stay
_xeconomics
650 0 4 _aLinear Models
650 0 4 _aMale
650 0 4 _aMiddle Aged
650 0 4 _aMultivariate Analysis
650 0 4 _aPeptic Ulcer Perforation
_xeconomics
650 0 4 _aTreatment Outcome
650 0 4 _aUnited States
700 1 _aDavis, Alan T
700 1 _aKoehler, Tracy J
700 1 _aScheeres, David E
773 0 _tSurgery
_gvol. 156
_gno. 4
_gp. 1003-7
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.047
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c24206743
_d24206743