000 | 00885 a2200253 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
005 | 20250516203715.0 | ||
264 | 0 | _c20150511 | |
008 | 201505s 0 0 eng d | ||
022 | _a1467-7687 | ||
024 | 7 |
_a10.1111/desc.12174 _2doi |
|
040 |
_aNLM _beng _cNLM |
||
100 | 1 | _aHeyes, Cecilia | |
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aRich interpretations of infant behaviour are popular, but are they valid? A reply to Scott and Baillargeon. _h[electronic resource] |
260 |
_bDevelopmental science _cSep 2014 |
||
300 |
_a665-6 p. _bdigital |
||
500 | _aPublication Type: Journal Article; Comment | ||
650 | 0 | 4 | _aCognition |
650 | 0 | 4 | _aConcept Formation |
650 | 0 | 4 | _aCulture |
650 | 0 | 4 | _aHumans |
650 | 0 | 4 |
_aInfant Behavior _xpsychology |
773 | 0 |
_tDevelopmental science _gvol. 17 _gno. 5 _gp. 665-6 |
|
856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12174 _zAvailable from publisher's website |
999 |
_c23674527 _d23674527 |