000 01411 a2200409 4500
005 20250516145409.0
264 0 _c20140109
008 201401s 0 0 eng d
022 _a1090-2414
024 7 _a10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.03.030
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aEsteban, S
245 0 0 _aNew microbioassays based on biomarkers are more sensitive to fluvial water micropollution than standard testing methods.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bEcotoxicology and environmental safety
_cJul 2013
300 _a52-9 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
650 0 4 _aAnimals
650 0 4 _aBiological Assay
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aBiomarkers
_xmetabolism
650 0 4 _aDaphnia
650 0 4 _aEmbryo, Nonmammalian
650 0 4 _aEnvironmental Monitoring
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aFerns
650 0 4 _aPolystichum
650 0 4 _aRivers
_xchemistry
650 0 4 _aToxicity Tests
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aWater Pollutants, Chemical
_xtoxicity
650 0 4 _aZebrafish
700 1 _aFernández Rodríguez, J
700 1 _aDíaz López, G
700 1 _aNuñez, M
700 1 _aValcárcel, Y
700 1 _aCatalá, M
773 0 _tEcotoxicology and environmental safety
_gvol. 93
_gp. 52-9
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.03.030
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c22700728
_d22700728