000 01554 a2200433 4500
005 20250516120059.0
264 0 _c20130404
008 201304s 0 0 eng d
022 _a1556-5653
024 7 _a10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.046
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aDíaz-Gimeno, Patricia
245 0 0 _aThe accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bFertility and sterility
_cFeb 2013
300 _a508-17 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
650 0 4 _aAdult
650 0 4 _aArtificial Intelligence
650 0 4 _aBiomarkers
_xanalysis
650 0 4 _aBiopsy
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aDiagnosis, Computer-Assisted
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aEndometrium
_xcytology
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aOvulation Detection
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aReproducibility of Results
650 0 4 _aSensitivity and Specificity
650 0 4 _aYoung Adult
700 1 _aRuiz-Alonso, Maria
700 1 _aBlesa, David
700 1 _aBosch, Nuria
700 1 _aMartínez-Conejero, José A
700 1 _aAlamá, Pilar
700 1 _aGarrido, Nicolás
700 1 _aPellicer, Antonio
700 1 _aSimón, Carlos
773 0 _tFertility and sterility
_gvol. 99
_gno. 2
_gp. 508-17
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.046
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c22217057
_d22217057