| 000 | 00942 a2200253 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | 20250516094628.0 | ||
| 264 | 0 | _c20121121 | |
| 008 | 201211s 0 0 eng d | ||
| 022 | _a1551-6709 | ||
| 024 | 7 |
_a10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01258.x _2doi |
|
| 040 |
_aNLM _beng _cNLM |
||
| 100 | 1 | _aKrahmer, Emiel | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 |
_aIs it that difficult to find a good preference order for the incremental algorithm? _h[electronic resource] |
| 260 |
_bCognitive science _cJul 2012 |
||
| 300 |
_a837-41; discussion 842-5 p. _bdigital |
||
| 500 | _aPublication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Comment | ||
| 650 | 0 | 4 | _aHumans |
| 650 | 0 | 4 | _aLanguage |
| 650 | 0 | 4 | _aLanguage Tests |
| 700 | 1 | _aKoolen, Ruud | |
| 700 | 1 | _aTheune, Mariët | |
| 773 | 0 |
_tCognitive science _gvol. 36 _gno. 5 _gp. 837-41; discussion 842-5 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2012.01258.x _zAvailable from publisher's website |
| 999 |
_c21841222 _d21841222 |
||