000 01645 a2200469 4500
005 20250516063746.0
264 0 _c20120321
008 201203s 0 0 eng d
022 _a1879-0518
024 7 _a10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.018
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aMadden, Tessa
245 0 0 _aComparison of contraceptive method chosen by women with and without a recent history of induced abortion.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bContraception
_cDec 2011
300 _a571-7 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
650 0 4 _aAbortion, Induced
_xpsychology
650 0 4 _aAdolescent
650 0 4 _aAdult
650 0 4 _aCohort Studies
650 0 4 _aContraception
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aContraception Behavior
650 0 4 _aContraceptive Agents, Female
_xadministration & dosage
650 0 4 _aDrug Implants
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aFollow-Up Studies
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aIntrauterine Devices
650 0 4 _aMiddle Aged
650 0 4 _aMissouri
650 0 4 _aPostoperative Period
650 0 4 _aPregnancy
650 0 4 _aPregnancy, Unwanted
_xpsychology
650 0 4 _aProspective Studies
650 0 4 _aSurveys and Questionnaires
650 0 4 _aYoung Adult
700 1 _aSecura, Gina M
700 1 _aAllsworth, Jenifer E
700 1 _aPeipert, Jeffrey F
773 0 _tContraception
_gvol. 84
_gno. 6
_gp. 571-7
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.018
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c21306621
_d21306621