000 01521 a2200433 4500
005 20250516042048.0
264 0 _c20110811
008 201108s 0 0 eng d
022 _a1530-0358
024 7 _a10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182182689
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aWong, Mark T C
245 0 0 _aThe magnetic anal sphincter versus the artificial bowel sphincter: a comparison of 2 treatments for fecal incontinence.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bDiseases of the colon and rectum
_cJul 2011
300 _a773-9 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
650 0 4 _aAdult
650 0 4 _aAged
650 0 4 _aAnal Canal
_xsurgery
650 0 4 _aDefecation
650 0 4 _aFeasibility Studies
650 0 4 _aFecal Incontinence
_xphysiopathology
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aFollow-Up Studies
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aIntestines
_xtransplantation
650 0 4 _aMagnetics
_xinstrumentation
650 0 4 _aMiddle Aged
650 0 4 _aPatient Satisfaction
650 0 4 _aProsthesis Design
650 0 4 _aProsthesis Implantation
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aRetrospective Studies
650 0 4 _aTreatment Outcome
700 1 _aMeurette, Guillaume
700 1 _aStangherlin, Pierre
700 1 _aLehur, Paul-Antoine
773 0 _tDiseases of the colon and rectum
_gvol. 54
_gno. 7
_gp. 773-9
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182182689
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c20910877
_d20910877