000 01563 a2200469 4500
005 20250515171930.0
264 0 _c20090713
008 200907s 0 0 eng d
022 _a0021-9010
024 7 _a10.1037/a0014665
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aBlanton, Hart
245 0 0 _aStrong claims and weak evidence: reassessing the predictive validity of the IAT.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bThe Journal of applied psychology
_cMay 2009
300 _a567-82; discussion 583-603 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Journal Article; Comment
650 0 4 _aAdult
650 0 4 _aBias
650 0 4 _aBlack People
_xpsychology
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aInterpersonal Relations
650 0 4 _aJob Application
650 0 4 _aJudgment
650 0 4 _aMale
650 0 4 _aNonverbal Communication
650 0 4 _aObserver Variation
650 0 4 _aPrejudice
650 0 4 _aPsychometrics
_xstatistics & numerical data
650 0 4 _aRace Relations
650 0 4 _aReproducibility of Results
650 0 4 _aUnconscious, Psychology
650 0 4 _aWhite People
_xpsychology
650 0 4 _aWord Association Tests
_xstatistics & numerical data
700 1 _aJaccard, James
700 1 _aKlick, Jonathan
700 1 _aMellers, Barbara
700 1 _aMitchell, Gregory
700 1 _aTetlock, Philip E
773 0 _tThe Journal of applied psychology
_gvol. 94
_gno. 3
_gp. 567-82; discussion 583-603
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1037/a0014665
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c18877037
_d18877037