000 01263 a2200349 4500
005 20250515162843.0
264 0 _c20090612
008 200906s 0 0 eng d
022 _a1873-4324
024 7 _a10.1016/j.aca.2008.08.023
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aPikkemaat, Mariƫl G
245 0 0 _aComparison of three microbial screening methods for antibiotics using routine monitoring samples.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bAnalytica chimica acta
_cApr 2009
300 _a298-304 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
650 0 4 _aAnimals
650 0 4 _aAnti-Bacterial Agents
_xanalysis
650 0 4 _aDrug Residues
_xanalysis
650 0 4 _aFood Inspection
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aMeat
_xanalysis
650 0 4 _aMicrobial Sensitivity Tests
_xmethods
650 0 4 _aReagent Kits, Diagnostic
650 0 4 _aSulfadiazine
_xanalysis
650 0 4 _aSwine
650 0 4 _aTetracyclines
_xanalysis
700 1 _aRapallini, Michel L B A
700 1 _aDijk, Sabrina Oostra-van
700 1 _aElferink, J W Alexander
773 0 _tAnalytica chimica acta
_gvol. 637
_gno. 1-2
_gp. 298-304
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2008.08.023
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c18725123
_d18725123