000 01202 a2200277 4500
005 20250515114305.0
264 0 _c20080617
008 200806s 0 0 eng d
022 _a8750-7587
024 7 _a10.1152/japplphysiol.01226.2007a
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aKacmarek, Robert M
245 0 0 _aCounterpoint: High-frequency ventilation is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
_cApr 2008
300 _a1232-3; discussion 1233-5 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Journal Article; Comment
650 0 4 _aAdult
650 0 4 _aHigh-Frequency Jet Ventilation
_xadverse effects
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aInfant, Newborn
650 0 4 _aRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
650 0 4 _aRespiratory Distress Syndrome
_xphysiopathology
650 0 4 _aRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
_xphysiopathology
773 0 _tJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
_gvol. 104
_gno. 4
_gp. 1232-3; discussion 1233-5
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01226.2007a
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c17884678
_d17884678