000 01722 a2200505 4500
005 20250511181424.0
264 0 _c19921217
008 199212s 0 0 eng d
022 _a0140-6736
024 7 _a10.1016/0140-6736(92)92891-i
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aLammer, J
245 0 0 _aPulsed excimer laser versus continuous-wave Nd:YAG laser versus conventional angioplasty of peripheral arterial occlusions: prospective, controlled, randomised trial.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bLancet (London, England)
_cNov 1992
300 _a1183-8 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial
650 0 4 _aAged
650 0 4 _aAged, 80 and over
650 0 4 _aAngioplasty
650 0 4 _aAngioplasty, Laser
_xinstrumentation
650 0 4 _aArterial Occlusive Diseases
_xsurgery
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aFemoral Artery
_xsurgery
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aLife Tables
650 0 4 _aMale
650 0 4 _aMiddle Aged
650 0 4 _aNeodymium
650 0 4 _aPeripheral Vascular Diseases
_xsurgery
650 0 4 _aPopliteal Artery
_xsurgery
650 0 4 _aPostoperative Complications
_xepidemiology
650 0 4 _aProspective Studies
650 0 4 _aRecurrence
650 0 4 _aReoperation
650 0 4 _aTreatment Outcome
650 0 4 _aVascular Patency
650 0 4 _aXenon
700 1 _aPilger, E
700 1 _aDecrinis, M
700 1 _aQuehenberger, F
700 1 _aKlein, G E
700 1 _aStark, G
773 0 _tLancet (London, England)
_gvol. 340
_gno. 8829
_gp. 1183-8
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)92891-i
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c1365759
_d1365759