000 01451 a2200421 4500
005 20250514080407.0
264 0 _c20031216
008 200312s 0 0 eng d
022 _a0192-0790
024 7 _a10.1097/00004836-200309000-00007
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aSeelig, Matthias H
245 0 0 _aComparison between open and laparoscopic technique in the management of perforated gastroduodenal ulcers.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bJournal of clinical gastroenterology
_cSep 2003
300 _a226-9 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Comparative Study; Evaluation Study; Journal Article
650 0 4 _aAdolescent
650 0 4 _aAdult
650 0 4 _aAged
650 0 4 _aAged, 80 and over
650 0 4 _aFemale
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aLaparoscopy
_xadverse effects
650 0 4 _aLaparotomy
_xadverse effects
650 0 4 _aLength of Stay
650 0 4 _aMale
650 0 4 _aMiddle Aged
650 0 4 _aPeptic Ulcer Perforation
_xsurgery
650 0 4 _aPostoperative Complications
650 0 4 _aRetrospective Studies
650 0 4 _aSeverity of Illness Index
650 0 4 _aTreatment Outcome
700 1 _aSeelig, Stefanie K
700 1 _aBehr, Christian
700 1 _aSchönleben, Klaus
773 0 _tJournal of clinical gastroenterology
_gvol. 37
_gno. 3
_gp. 226-9
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-200309000-00007
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c12729711
_d12729711