000 01481 a2200493 4500
005 20250514013649.0
264 0 _c19860203
008 198602s 0 0 eng d
022 _a0040-6457
024 7 _a10.5840/thought198257443
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aSanturri, Edmund N
245 0 0 _aSubstituted judgment and the terminally-ill incompetent.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bThought
_cDec 1982
300 _a484-501 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Journal Article
650 0 4 _aAltruism
650 0 4 _aBeneficence
650 0 4 _aDecision Making
650 0 4 _aEthical Theory
650 0 4 _aEthics
650 0 4 _aEuthanasia, Passive
650 0 4 _aFreedom
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aIndividuality
650 0 4 _aJudicial Role
650 0 4 _aJurisprudence
650 0 4 _aLegal Guardians
650 0 4 _aLife Support Care
650 0 4 _aMental Competency
650 0 4 _aPersistent Vegetative State
650 0 4 _aPersonal Autonomy
650 0 4 _aPersonhood
650 0 4 _aPersons with Intellectual Disabilities
650 0 4 _aReference Standards
650 0 4 _aRight to Die
650 0 4 _aTerminally Ill
650 0 4 _aThird-Party Consent
650 0 4 _aTreatment Refusal
650 0 4 _aWithholding Treatment
700 1 _aWerpehowski, William
773 0 _tThought
_gvol. 57
_gno. 227
_gp. 484-501
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.5840/thought198257443
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c11567960
_d11567960