000 01479 a2200481 4500
005 20250514013540.0
264 0 _c19930615
008 199306s 0 0 eng d
022 _a1041-3545
024 7 _a10.1007/BF01138158
_2doi
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aHerrera, Christopher
245 0 0 _aSome ways that technology and terminology distort the euthanasia issue.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bThe Journal of medical humanities
_c1993
300 _a23-31 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Journal Article
650 0 4 _aAltruism
650 0 4 _aBeneficence
650 0 4 _aBiomedical Technology
650 0 4 _aDeath
650 0 4 _aDouble Effect Principle
650 0 4 _aEthics
650 0 4 _aEuthanasia
650 0 4 _aEuthanasia, Active
650 0 4 _aEuthanasia, Passive
650 0 4 _aHealth Personnel
650 0 4 _aHomicide
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aIntention
650 0 4 _aLife Support Care
650 0 4 _aMetaphor
650 0 4 _aMoral Obligations
650 0 4 _aMotivation
650 0 4 _aPatients
650 0 4 _aPharmaceutical Preparations
650 0 4 _aProfessional-Patient Relations
650 0 4 _aSocial Responsibility
650 0 4 _aStress, Psychological
650 0 4 _aSuicide, Assisted
650 0 4 _aTerminology as Topic
773 0 _tThe Journal of medical humanities
_gvol. 14
_gno. 1
_gp. 23-31
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/BF01138158
_zAvailable from publisher's website
999 _c11564189
_d11564189