000 01301 a2200277 4500
005 20250513212851.0
264 0 _c20000921
008 200009s 0 0 eng d
022 _a0963-1801
040 _aNLM
_beng
_cNLM
100 1 _aCatlin, A J
245 0 0 _aResponse to "Giving 'moral distress' a voice: ethical concerns among neonatal intensive care unit personnel" by Pam Hefferman and Steve Heilig and "Neonatal viability in the 1990s: held hostage by technology" by Jonathan Muraskas et al. (CQ Vol 8, no 2). Continuing the dialogue: resuscitation of marginally viable neonates.
_h[electronic resource]
260 _bCambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees
_c2000
300 _a400-3 p.
_bdigital
500 _aPublication Type: Journal Article; Comment
650 0 4 _aEthics, Nursing
650 0 4 _aHumans
650 0 4 _aInfant, Newborn
650 0 4 _aIntensive Care, Neonatal
_xstandards
650 0 4 _aMorals
650 0 4 _aResuscitation
_xstatistics & numerical data
650 0 4 _aUnited States
650 0 4 _aWithholding Treatment
700 1 _aCarter, B S
773 0 _tCambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees
_gvol. 9
_gno. 3
_gp. 400-3
999 _c10809847
_d10809847