Your search returned 4 results.

Results
	1.	Risk of bias assessments for selective reporting were inadequate in the majority of Cochrane reviews. [electronic resource] by Saric, Frano Barcot, Ognjen Puljak, Livia Producer: 20200520 In: Journal of clinical epidemiology vol. 112 Online resources: Available from publisher's website Availability: No items available. Save to lists Add to cart (remove)
	2.	Cochrane plain language summaries are highly heterogeneous with low adherence to the standards. [electronic resource] by Jelicic Kadic, Antonia Fidahic, Mahir Vujcic, Milan Saric, Frano Propadalo, Ivana Marelja, Ivana Dosenovic, Svjetlana Puljak, Livia Producer: 20171124 In: BMC medical research methodology vol. 16 Online resources: Available from publisher's website Availability: No items available. Save to lists Add to cart (remove)
	3.	Overall bias methods and their use in sensitivity analysis of Cochrane reviews were not consistent. [electronic resource] by Babic, Andrija Vuka, Ivana Saric, Frano Proloscic, Ivona Slapnicar, Ema Cavar, Jakica Poklepovic Pericic, Tina Pieper, Dawid Puljak, Livia Producer: 20201001 In: Journal of clinical epidemiology vol. 119 Online resources: Available from publisher's website Availability: No items available. Save to lists Add to cart (remove)
	4.	Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials. [electronic resource] by Krsticevic, Miso Saric, Dragica Saric, Frano Slapnicar, Ema Boric, Krste Dosenovic, Svjetlana Jelicic Kadic, Antonia Kegalj, Milka Jeric Puljak, Livia Producer: 20200601 In: Journal of comparative effectiveness research vol. 8 Online resources: Available from publisher's website Availability: No items available. Save to lists Add to cart (remove)