Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Closed-loop superluminal passive cavity. [electronic resource]

By:

Smith, David D

Contributor(s):

Producer: 20180817Description: 14905-14914 p. digitalISSN:

1094-4087

Online resources:

Available from publisher's website

In: Optics express vol. 26

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

No physical items for this record

Publication Type: Journal Article

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Previous

Back to results

Next

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

1 In reply to: "Not All Young Journals are Predatory".
by Murphy, Linda S
2 Predatory Publishing: How to Safely Navigate the Waters of Open Access.
by Houghton, Frank
3 Predatory Publishing: A Sinister, Brave New World.
by Munk, Peter L
4 Predatory Open-Access Medical Publishers "Caveat Emptor".
by LaBan, Myron M
5 Open access? Yes! But how?
by Stoffers, Jelle
6 Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Palliative and Supportive Care.
by Cortegiani, Andrea
7 Publishing: Predatory publishing.
by Bajpai, M
8 Editorial 2016.
by Narum, Shawn
9 Set Them Free!
by Tárnok, Attila
10 Open access: infatuation or love at first sight?
by Persson, P B
11 Open-access publishing, a double-edged blade.
by Mainardi, Federico
12 Open Access-or Open Science?
by Pulverer, Bernd
13 Authors and readers beware the dark side of Open Access.
by Pickler, Rita
14 Open access publishing.
by Gould, Kathleen Ahern
15 Editorial: From open-access to 'predatory' publishing.
by Van Meerbeek, Bart
16 Open or Conventional Access: Integrity in the Process.
by Clarke, Pamela N
17 Predatory Publishing in Nursing.
by Milton, Constance L
18 Letter From The Editor.
by Hutchinson, Ted
19 Open Access: Is There a Predator at the Door?
by Chandra, Rakesh
20 The deal with DEAL for open access: The recent publish-and-read deals have increased momentum for open-access publishing but may not solve the challenge of open science.
by Hunter, Philip

Close