Results
|
21.
|
|
|
22.
|
|
|
23.
|
|
|
24.
|
|
|
25.
|
|
|
26.
|
|
|
27.
|
|
|
28.
|
Re: Properties of the 4-Kallikrein Panel Outside the Diagnostic Gray Zone: Meta-Analysis of Patients with Positive Digital Rectal Examination or Prostate Specific Antigen 10 ng/ml and Above: A. Vickers, E. A. Vertosick, D. D. Sjoberg, M. J. Roobol, F. Hamdy, D. Neal, A. Bjartell, J. Hugosson, J. L. Donovan, A. Villers, S. Zappala and H. Lilja J Urol 2017;197:607-613. [electronic resource] by Producer: 20190314
In:
The Journal of urology vol. 198
Availability: No items available.
|
|
29.
|
|
|
30.
|
|
|
31.
|
|
|
32.
|
|
|
33.
|
Re: Florian Jentzmik, Carsten Stephan, Kurt Miller, et al. Sarcosine in urine after digital rectal examination fails as a marker in prostate cancer detection and identification of aggressive tumours. Eur Urol 2010;58:12-8. [electronic resource] by
- Sreekumar, Arun
- Poisson, Laila M
- Rajendiran, Thekkelnaycke M
- Khan, Amjad P
- Cao, Qi
- Yu, Jindan
- Laxman, Bharathi
- Mehra, Rohit
- Lonigro, Robert J
- Li, Yong
- Nyati, Mukesh K
- Ahsan, Aarif
- Kalyana-Sundaram, Shanker
- Han, Bo
- Cao, Xuhong
- Byun, Jaeman
- Omenn, Gilbert S
- Ghoshd, Debashis
- Pennathur, Subramaniam
- Alexander, Danny C
- Berger, Alvin
- Shuster, Jeffrey R
- Wei, John T
- Varambally, Sooryanarayana
- Beecher, Christopher
- Chinnaiyan, Arul M
Producer: 20110106
In:
European urology vol. 58
Availability: No items available.
|
|
34.
|
|
|
35.
|
|
|
36.
|
|
|
37.
|
|
|
38.
|
|
|
39.
|
|
|
40.
|
|