Strickberger, S A <br/><br/>
Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements.  [electronic resource] 

 -  American heart journal  May 1996 
 - 961-5 p.  digital 
<br/><br/> Publication Type: Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
<br/><br/><label>ISSN: </label>0002-8703 
<br/><br/><label>Standard No.: </label>10.1016/s0002-8703(96)90180-5  doi 
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Topical Terms: </label><br/>Aged<br/>Cardiomyopathy, Dilated--therapy<br/>Coronary Disease--therapy<br/>Defibrillators, Implantable<br/>Electric Countershock--instrumentation<br/>Electrodes, Implanted<br/>Female<br/>Humans<br/>Male<br/>Middle Aged<br/>Prospective Studies<br/>Tachycardia, Ventricular--therapy