Deng, H-Y <br/><br/>
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.  [electronic resource] 

 -  Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus  Jul 2019 
<br/><br/> Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article 
<br/><br/><label>ISSN: </label>1442-2050 
<br/><br/><label>Standard No.: </label>10.1093/dote/doy110  doi 
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Topical Terms: </label><br/>Abdomen<br/>Aged<br/>Esophageal Neoplasms--pathology<br/>Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma--secondary<br/>Esophagectomy--adverse effects<br/>Female<br/>Humans<br/>Lymph Node Excision--adverse effects<br/>Lymph Nodes--pathology<br/>Lymphatic Metastasis<br/>Male<br/>Middle Aged<br/>Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures--adverse effects<br/>Neoplasm Staging<br/>Postoperative Complications--etiology<br/>Propensity Score<br/>Prospective Studies<br/>Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve<br/>Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries--etiology<br/>Robotic Surgical Procedures--adverse effects<br/>Treatment Outcome<br/>Video-Assisted Surgery--adverse effects