TY  - GEN
AU  - Seravalli,Enrica
AU  - Bosman,Mirjam
AU  - Lassen-Ramshad,Yasmin
AU  - Vestergaard,Anne
AU  - Oldenburger,Foppe
AU  - Visser,Jorrit
AU  - Koutsouveli,Efi
AU  - Paraskevopoulou,Chryssa
AU  - Horan,Gail
AU  - Ajithkumar,Thankamma
AU  - Timmermann,Beate
AU  - Fuentes,Carolina-Sofia
AU  - Whitfield,Gillian
AU  - Marchant,Thomas
AU  - Padovani,Laetitia
AU  - Garnier,Eloise
AU  - Gandola,Lorenza
AU  - Meroni,Silvia
AU  - Hoeben,Bianca A W
AU  - Kusters,Martijn
AU  - Alapetite,Claire
AU  - Losa,Sandra
AU  - Goudjil,Farid
AU  - Magelssen,Henriette
AU  - Evensen,Morten Egeberg
AU  - Saran,Frank
AU  - Smyth,Gregory
AU  - Rombi,Barbara
AU  - Righetto,Roberto
AU  - Kortmann,Rolf-Dieter
AU  - Janssens,Geert O
TI  - Dosimetric comparison of five different techniques for craniospinal irradiation across 15 European centers: analysis on behalf of the SIOP-E-BTG (radiotherapy working group)
SN  - 1651-226X
PY  - 2019///0111
KW  - Adolescent
KW  - Advisory Committees
KW  - organization & administration
KW  - Craniospinal Irradiation
KW  - methods
KW  - Europe
KW  - epidemiology
KW  - Humans
KW  - Male
KW  - Organs at Risk
KW  - radiation effects
KW  - Practice Patterns, Physicians'
KW  - statistics & numerical data
KW  - Radiation Oncology
KW  - Radiometry
KW  - Radiotherapy Dosage
KW  - Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
N1  - Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2018.1465588
ER  -