Dangas, George D <br/><br/>
Impact of hemodynamic support with Impella 2.5 versus intra-aortic balloon pump on prognostically important clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (from the PROTECT II randomized trial).  [electronic resource] 

 -  The American journal of cardiology  Jan 2014 
 - 222-8 p.  digital 
<br/><br/> Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Multicenter Study; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 
<br/><br/><label>ISSN: </label>1879-1913 
<br/><br/><label>Standard No.: </label>10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.09.008  doi 
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Topical Terms: </label><br/>Aged<br/>Canada--epidemiology<br/>Coronary Angiography<br/>Equipment Design<br/>Europe--epidemiology<br/>Female<br/>Follow-Up Studies<br/>Hemodynamics--physiology<br/>Humans<br/>Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping--instrumentation<br/>Male<br/>Myocardial Infarction--diagnostic imaging<br/>Percutaneous Coronary Intervention--methods<br/>Prognosis<br/>Prospective Studies<br/>Risk Factors<br/>Shock, Cardiogenic--mortality<br/>Survival Rate--trends<br/>United States--epidemiology