Cevidanes, Lucia <br/><br/>
Comparison of two protocols for maxillary protraction: bone anchors versus face mask with rapid maxillary expansion.  [electronic resource] 

 -  The Angle orthodontist  Sep 2010 
 - 799-806 p.  digital 
<br/><br/> Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article 
<br/><br/><label>ISSN: </label>1945-7103 
<br/><br/><label>Standard No.: </label>10.2319/111709-651.1  doi 
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Topical Terms: </label><br/>Bone Plates<br/>Cephalometry<br/>Child<br/>Clinical Protocols<br/>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography<br/>Extraoral Traction Appliances<br/>Female<br/>Humans<br/>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted<br/>Incisor--pathology<br/>Male<br/>Malocclusion, Angle Class III--therapy<br/>Mandible--pathology<br/>Maxilla--pathology<br/>Orthodontic Anchorage Procedures--instrumentation<br/>Orthodontic Appliance Design<br/>Palatal Expansion Technique<br/>Prospective Studies<br/>Rotation<br/>Skull Base--pathology<br/>Treatment Outcome<br/>Vertical Dimension