Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes. [electronic resource]
Producer: 20200120ISSN:- 1442-2050
- Abdomen
- Aged
- Esophageal Neoplasms -- pathology
- Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma -- secondary
- Esophagectomy -- adverse effects
- Female
- Humans
- Lymph Node Excision -- adverse effects
- Lymph Nodes -- pathology
- Lymphatic Metastasis
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures -- adverse effects
- Neoplasm Staging
- Postoperative Complications -- etiology
- Propensity Score
- Prospective Studies
- Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve
- Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries -- etiology
- Robotic Surgical Procedures -- adverse effects
- Treatment Outcome
- Video-Assisted Surgery -- adverse effects
No physical items for this record
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.