APA

Giessing M., Kroencke T. J., Taupitz M., Feldmann C., Deger S., Turk I., Budde K., Ebeling V., Schoenberger B. & Loening S. A. (20031023). Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors?. : Transplantation.

Chicago

Giessing Markus, Kroencke Thomas J, Taupitz Matthias, Feldmann Claudia, Deger Serdar, Turk Ingolf, Budde Klemens, Ebeling Volko, Schoenberger Bernd and Loening Stefan A. 20031023. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors?. : Transplantation.

Harvard

Giessing M., Kroencke T. J., Taupitz M., Feldmann C., Deger S., Turk I., Budde K., Ebeling V., Schoenberger B. and Loening S. A. (20031023). Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors?. : Transplantation.

MLA

Giessing Markus, Kroencke Thomas J, Taupitz Matthias, Feldmann Claudia, Deger Serdar, Turk Ingolf, Budde Klemens, Ebeling Volko, Schoenberger Bernd and Loening Stefan A. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors?. : Transplantation. 20031023.