Should general practice be a specialty in its own right? (Record no. 26462703)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 00684 a2200193 4500
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250517115915.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field ####s 0 0 eng d
022 ## - INTERNATIONAL STANDARD SERIAL NUMBER
International Standard Serial Number 1756-1833
024 7# - OTHER STANDARD IDENTIFIER
Standard number or code 10.1136/bmj.i5097
Source of number or code doi
040 ## - CATALOGING SOURCE
Original cataloging agency NLM
Language of cataloging eng
Transcribing agency NLM
100 1# - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name McManus, Richard J
245 00 - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Should general practice be a specialty in its own right?
Medium [electronic resource]
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Name of publisher, distributor, etc. BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Date of publication, distribution, etc. Sep 2016
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent i5097 p.
Other physical details digital
500 ## - GENERAL NOTE
General note Publication Type: Editorial
700 1# - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name Hobbs, F D Richard
773 0# - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Title BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
Related parts vol. 354
-- p. i5097
856 40 - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5097">https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5097</a>
Public note Available from publisher's website

No items available.