Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.
Yepes-Nuñez, Juan José
Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. [electronic resource] - BMJ open 01 2018 - e015623 p. digital
Publication Type: Equivalence Trial; Journal Article
2044-6055
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015623 doi
Humans
Comprehension
Evidence-Based Medicine
Information Dissemination--methods
Models, Statistical
Ontario
Research Design
Research Report--standards
Systematic Reviews as Topic
Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. [electronic resource] - BMJ open 01 2018 - e015623 p. digital
Publication Type: Equivalence Trial; Journal Article
2044-6055
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015623 doi
Humans
Comprehension
Evidence-Based Medicine
Information Dissemination--methods
Models, Statistical
Ontario
Research Design
Research Report--standards
Systematic Reviews as Topic