Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford, Sara
Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013. [electronic resource] - Fertility and sterility 01 2017 - 110-118 p. digital
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
1556-5653
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.002 doi
Abortion, Spontaneous--etiology
Adult
Chi-Square Distribution
Cryopreservation
Embryo Implantation
Embryo Transfer
Female
Fertility
Fertilization in Vitro--adverse effects
Humans
Infertility--diagnosis
Live Birth
Odds Ratio
Oocyte Donation
Oocyte Retrieval
Ovulation Induction
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States
Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013. [electronic resource] - Fertility and sterility 01 2017 - 110-118 p. digital
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
1556-5653
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.002 doi
Abortion, Spontaneous--etiology
Adult
Chi-Square Distribution
Cryopreservation
Embryo Implantation
Embryo Transfer
Female
Fertility
Fertilization in Vitro--adverse effects
Humans
Infertility--diagnosis
Live Birth
Odds Ratio
Oocyte Donation
Oocyte Retrieval
Ovulation Induction
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Rate
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
United States