Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1.
Jansen, Jeroen P
Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. [electronic resource] - Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Jun 2011 - 417-28 p. digital
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
1524-4733
10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.002 doi
Advisory Committees--standards
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care--standards
Economics, Pharmaceutical--standards
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Outcome Assessment, Health Care--standards
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic--methods
Research Design--standards
Research Report--standards
Treatment Outcome
Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. [electronic resource] - Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Jun 2011 - 417-28 p. digital
Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article
1524-4733
10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.002 doi
Advisory Committees--standards
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care--standards
Economics, Pharmaceutical--standards
Humans
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Outcome Assessment, Health Care--standards
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic--methods
Research Design--standards
Research Report--standards
Treatment Outcome