Normal view MARC view ISBD view

DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more effective than ribotyping in distinguishing among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Prevost, G

DNA fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis is more effective than ribotyping in distinguishing among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. [electronic resource] - Journal of clinical microbiology Apr 1992 - 967-73 p. digital

Publication Type: Comparative Study; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

ISSN: 0095-1137

Standard No.: 10.1128/jcm.30.4.967-973.1992 doi

Subjects--Topical Terms:
Bacterial Typing Techniques
DNA Fingerprinting--methods
DNA, Bacterial--genetics
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Methicillin Resistance--genetics
Staphylococcus aureus--classification

Print
Cite
Add to your cart (remove)
Save record
BIBTEX Dublin Core MARCXML MARC (non-Unicode/MARC-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8) MARC (Unicode/UTF-8, Standard) MODS (XML) RIS ISBD
More searches

Search for this title in:
Other Libraries (WorldCat) Other Databases (Google Scholar) Online Stores (Bookfinder.com) Open Library (openlibrary.org)