Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions.
Pappalardo, G
Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. [electronic resource] - Gastroenterology Aug 2000 - 300-4 p. digital
Publication Type: Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article
0016-5085
10.1053/gast.2000.9353 doi
Adenocarcinoma--diagnosis
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colonoscopy--standards
Colorectal Neoplasms--diagnosis
Confidence Intervals
Female
Humans
Intestinal Polyps--diagnosis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging--methods
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. [electronic resource] - Gastroenterology Aug 2000 - 300-4 p. digital
Publication Type: Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article
0016-5085
10.1053/gast.2000.9353 doi
Adenocarcinoma--diagnosis
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colonoscopy--standards
Colorectal Neoplasms--diagnosis
Confidence Intervals
Female
Humans
Intestinal Polyps--diagnosis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging--methods
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity